Double-blind reviewing at EvoLang
نویسنده
چکیده
The impact of introducing double-blind reviewing in the most recent Evolution of Language conference is assessed. The ranking of papers is compared between EvoLang 11 (double-blind review) and EvoLang 9 and 10 (single-blind review). Main effects were found for first author gender by conference. The results mirror some findings in the literature on the effects of double-blind review, suggesting that it helps reduce a bias against female authors.
منابع مشابه
How to Increase the Chances
It is important to keep in mind that SIGCOMM runs a double-blind reviewing process. By double-blind we mean that authors don’t know who their reviewers are, and reviewers don’t know who the authors are. Personally, I’m a big fan of double-blind reviewing. Double-blind reviewing focuses attention on the papers, rather than who wrote the papers. And every year there are some surprises — SIGCOMM a...
متن کاملJSCI Editorial Peer Reviewing Methodology
The Peer Review Methodology Used in the Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics is Based on three-tier reviews: open (or non-blind), double-blind, and participative reviews. Final acceptance depends of the three kinds of reviews but a paper should be recommended by nonblind reviewers AND blind reviewers in order to be accepted for publication. A recommendation to accept made by non-b...
متن کاملSingle versus Double Blind Reviewing at WSDM 2017
In this paper we study the implications for conference program commiees of adopting single-blind reviewing, in which committee members are aware of the names and aliations of paper authors, versus double-blind reviewing, in which this information is not visible to commiee members. WSDM 2017, the 10th ACM International ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, performed a controlled exper...
متن کاملDouble Blind Reviews in SE conferences: Practicability, Promises, and Perils
The peer review process is central to the scientific method, the advancement and spread of research as well as crucial for individual careers. As such, a single blind review process is susceptible towards apparent and hidden biases in the reviewers, as they know the identity of the authors. In this paper, we perform an extensive study on the benefits and costs that would be associated with intr...
متن کاملDouble blind reviews in software engineering venues: Practicability, promises and perils
The peer review process is central to the scientific method, the advancement and spread of research as well as crucial for individual careers. However, the single blind review process currently used in most Software Engineering (SE) venues is susceptible towards apparent and hidden biases, since reviewers know the identity of authors. In this paper, we perform a study on the benefits and costs ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016